Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jacquline Nylander Altelius vs June Bjork Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Altelius vs Bjork analysis and find out who is favored!
Jacquline Nylander Altelius vs June Bjork Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Altelius 1 - 0 Bjork
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Altelius has won 45.05% of points on their second serve, while Bjork has won 32.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Altelius, in recent form, has won 62.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bjork has won 56.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.15% and 45.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Altelius has saved 58.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjork has saved 46.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Altelius has won 57.78% of matches played (W/L 26/ 19), with Bjork winning 48.39% (W/L 15/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Altelius has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 53/ 55), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Bjork has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Altelius has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15), where as Bjork has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 15/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Altelius winning 1 times and Bjork being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Altelius winning 2 and Bjork winning 0. The last match between Altelius and Bjork was at the W15 Varberg, 30-04-2024, First, Clay with Jacquline Nylander Altelius getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Altelius and Bjork have played a deciding set 0 times, with Altelius winning 0 times and Bjork 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Altelius winning 0, and Bjork 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Altelius has played against opponents with an average rank of 35.22 while Bjork has played against players with an average rank of 75.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Altelius has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjork has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Altelius has converted 52.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjork has converted 52.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
47% (63-70)
Career Total W/L
45% (22-27)
63% (20-12)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jacquline Nylander Altelius vs June Bjork For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Altelius VS Bjork
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Jacquline Nylander Altelius | June Bjork |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (38/51) | 58% (25/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (23/38) | 36% (9/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (5/13) | 17% (3/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 72% (31/43) | 45% (23/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
June Bjork
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
10
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jacquline Nylander Altelius | June Bjork |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (20/12) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (45/27) | 44% (12/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (356/275) | 47% (127/144) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (20/10) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.06 | 0.69 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 49.53 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (812/1145) | 64% (463/723) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (441/812) | 53% (247/463) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (150/333) | 33% (85/260) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (83/159) | 52% (55/105) |
| Return Pts W% | 52% (539/1046) | 50% (387/775) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (20/10) | 45% (5/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (20/32) | 42% (5/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 0% (6/0) |
Jacquline Nylander Altelius Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Luna Ivkovic
55%
(
61 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
51%
(
57 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
55 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Carolina Troiano
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Frederikke Svarre
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Karolina Krajmer
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Lejla Hana Golubovic
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Frederikke Svarre
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sina Herrmann
Player
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
86%
(
59 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
June Bjork Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Ria Dernikovic
Player
June Bjork
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucrezia Musetti
Player
June Bjork
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
64
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 2-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
June Bjork
Player
Maria Ivankovic
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
36 of
84)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
8
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
16%
(
3 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
53%
(
33 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carina Syrtveit
Player
June Bjork
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 7-6(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
June Bjork
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
10
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Garcia Cid
Player
June Bjork
91%
(
52 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
June Bjork
Player
Abigail Amos
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
-
Aces
-
12
Double Faults
8
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
50 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
June Bjork
Player
Carolina Mesquita
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
55%
(
36 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Monika Wojcik
Player
June Bjork
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Altelius Vs Bjork Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Altelius are available here and Bjork photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
